HAP Radiology Billing and Coding Blog

MIPS Rules Changes For 2018: What Radiology Practices Need To Know

Posted: By HAP USA on January 23, 2018

MIPS Rules Changes For 2018 What Radiology Practices Need To Know.jpgThe first performance measurement year of the Medicare Incentive-based Payment System (MIPS) was 2017, the results of which will be used to determine Medicare payment adjustments in 2019.  This was considered a “transition year” that allowed practices to “pick your pace,” ranging from a streamlined path that would simply avoid penalties in 2019 to full participation that could generate positive payment adjustments in 2019.  The bar has been raised for 2018 performance measurement, and it will continue to be raised again in 2019 as the program reaches full implementation as required by law.  This article summarizes the changes for 2018 that will affect the performance of radiology practices as they work to maximize their reimbursement in 2020.

Final Score

The minimum requirement for 2018 in order to avoid a 2020 payment penalty of 5% is to reach the performance threshold of 15 points, an increase from the 3-points threshold of 2017 (which avoided a 4% penalty).  Practices that are made up of 15 or fewer Eligible Clinicians (EC) (known as Small Practices) will receive 5 bonus points to start with, and practices that treat “complex patients” will also receive 5 bonus points.  This latter bonus could be available to radiation oncologists.

 

Maximizing the Final Score will earn a positive payment adjustment in 2020.  The payment adjustment is a budget-neutral calculation that determines a scaling factor to be applied to the 5% maximum adjustment, which is an increase from the 4% limit in 2017.

 

As in 2017 a Final Score of 70 or more points will be considered “exceptional performance”, which will earn an additional payment adjustment ranging from 0.5% up to 10% times the scaling factor.

 

The Final Score is determined by a weighted average of the four performance categories.  For 2018, the nominal value for each category is as follows:

 

Category Contribution to Final Score
Quality 50%
Advancing Care Information (ACI) 25%
Improvement Activities (IA) 15%
Cost 10%

 

However, the weight of each of these categories could change for a variety of reasons.  For example, Small Practices will be exempt from ACI with the result that Quality becomes worth 85% of their Final Score.  Let’s review the details of each performance category for 2018.

Quality

Quality continues to be the most important, highest-weighted category.  The zero-weighting of other categories can add to its nominal weight of 50%.  For 2018, a full 12 months of data must be submitted in the Quality Category rather than the 90-day period that was allowed in 2017. (The ACI and IA categories maintain the 90-day reporting requirement.) 

 

A minimum of 6 measures must be reported.  If more than 6 are reported, only the best 6 scores will be used.  Data must be gathered from at least 60% of all patients in the practice, an increase from the 50% requirement in 2017. 

 

Each measure is worth 10 points, with certain exceptions:

  • Measures that do not meet the “data completeness criteria” of 60% described above will only be worth 1 point each. However, a Small Practice will earn 3 points per measure in this case.

  • Measures that are “topped out” will be worth a maximum of 7 points each, under a policy that is new for 2018. The 6 topped-out measures for 2018 are listed below. Topped-out measures are those whose median performance is 95 percent or higher, and they will be removed and scored on a 4-year phasing out timeline.
The Topped-out Measures for 2018
Measure Description
21

Perioperative Care: Selection of prophylactic antibiotic - first or second generation cephalosporin.

224 Melanoma: Overutilization of imaging studies in melanoma
23 Perioperative Care: venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis (when indicated in all patients)
262 Image confirmation of successful excision of image-localized breast lesion
359 Optimizing Patient Exposure to Ionizing Radiation: Utilization of a standardized nomenclature for Computed Tomography (CT) imaging description
52 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Inhaled bronchodilator therapy

 

New for 2018 are bonus points for showing improvement in Quality performance over the previous year.  This measurement will be performed by CMS and up to 10 percentage points will be awarded in the performance category, provided there is sufficient data in the two performance periods.

Advancing Care Information (ACI)

There are few changes to the basic requirements for reporting under ACI, although there are some new opportunities to earn bonus points.  They include:

  • A 10% bonus for using only the 2015 Edition of Certified EHR Technology (CEHRT). Use of the 2014 Edition is permissible for reporting, but will not qualify for a bonus.

  • Up to 10% of the performance score can be earned for reporting to any single public health agency or clinical data registry.

  • A 5% bonus score is available for submitting to an additional public health agency or clinical data registry not reported under the performance score.

  • Additional Improvement Activities are eligible for a 10% ACI bonus if CEHRT is used to complete at least one of the specified Improvement Activities.

An exemption from ACI for any reason would result in a shift of the category’s 25 percentage points to the Quality Category, thereby making Quality worth 85% of the Final Score.  This would be the case for radiologists who qualify as hospital-based or “non-patient facing.”  Those definitions have not changed for 2018, except that services in off-campus hospital outpatient departments (POS 19) will now be included in the determination.  Other reasons for exemption include:

  • Small Practices of 15 or fewer EC’s
  • EC’s practicing in Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASC)
  • EC’s whose Electronic Health Record (EHR) system was de-certified
  • Other significant hardships available by application to CMS by December 31 of the performance year

Improvement Activities (IA)

The basic IA reporting requirements are unchanged, but 20 new activities have been added to the inventory for a total of 112 possible activities from which to choose.  As noted above, the selection of some Improvement Activities will also qualify for a bonus under ACI.  It is also important to note that under Group Reporting only one EC in the group is required to perform the Improvement Activity in order for the entire group to get credit. 

 

A maximum of 40 points are needed to reach the full 15% contribution toward the Final Score, from any combination of 4 medium- or 2 high-weighted activities.  An important rule for radiologists who qualify as non-patient facing is that the value of each activity is doubled so that, at most, 2 medium- or 1 high-weighted are needed to earn 40 points.  This same level of reporting applies to Small Practices.

 

Radiologists might want to consider use of the Radiology Support Communication and Alignment Network (R-SCAN) program offered by the American College of Radiology (ACR) as their medium-weighted Improvement Activities.  This has the added advantage of helping the practice prepare for the Clinical Decision Support (CDS) requirement that Medicare will impose beginning in 2020.

Cost

While the proposed MIPS rules indicated that the Cost Category would be zero-weighted (i.e., not counted for MIPS) in 2018 as it was in 2017, the final rule for 2018 indicates that Cost will be 10% of the MIPS Final Score.  There is no separate reporting required, as the data is taken from the Medicare claims submitted routinely by the practice.  There will be a 1 percentage point bonus available for improvement year over year, when sufficient data exists.

 

CMS will evaluate individual ECs and group practices on two measures in 2018: (1) total per-capita cost of care for attributed beneficiaries and (2) Medicare Spending per Beneficiary (MSPB).  According to Robert Still, Executive Director of the Radiology Business Management Association (RBMA), writing in the RBMA Practice Management Forum, “RBMA is encouraging members to review prior year QRUR [Quality and Resource Use Reports] reports and review patients who have been attributed to their groups. It is recommended you strive to understand the variables that contributed to these patients being attributed to your Tax ID under the PCP and Medicare Spend Per Beneficiary attribution methodologies. Table 5 in the QRUR reports provides the detail of these attributions.”

Reporting Options and Exclusions from MIPS

New for 2018 is the availability of Virtual Groups.  This rule allows either individual ECs or groups of 10 or fewer ECs to unite with each other and report as a single group practice.  The election period for participation as a virtual group in 2018 ended on December 31, 2017.  The definition of non-patient facing ECs applies to virtual groups in the same way as it applies to other groups.  Our blog article entitled Is a Virtual Group an Option for Radiologists Reporting Under MIPS covers this topic in more detail.

 

The Low-Volume Threshold exempts individual ECs from any MIPS reporting.  For 2018 the exemption applies to an EC with $90,000 or less in Medicare allowed charges (increased from $30,000), or an EC with 200 or fewer Medicare beneficiaries assigned to him or her (increased from 100 or fewer).

Conclusion

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) provides a comprehensive Fact Sheet that is available from its web site, and the ACR has published a summary of the 2018 rules that is of special interest to radiologists.  Our 2017 article Why the MIPS Patient-Facing Rules are Important to Radiologists goes into detail on this aspect of MIPS, and our radiology RCM blog is full of additional information related to the complex MIPS rules.  We will continue to provide updates to help radiologists maximize their performance under MIPS.

 

Recent Articles:

 

How the 2018 Coding Changes Will Affect Radiology Practices

 

Regulatory Changes Affecting Radiology Reimbursement in 2018

 

Is a Virtual Group an Option for Radiologists Reporting MIPS?

 

Radiology Leaders Comment on the Realities of the QPP

 

Free video - What radiologists need to know about MIPS and the QPP for 2018

 

Topics: MIPS participation, MIPS, radiology

Subscribe to our radiology billing and coding blog

Recent Posts

Testimonial

How a radiology practice recovered lost referrals